Article

Nobody Should Have to Explain Their Right to Belong

October 24, 2026

Being noticed is not the same as being known. A visible difference can become the thing people respond to first, and sometimes the thing they never manage to look beyond. The person themselves has to wait while everyone else deals with their appearance.

There is a particular unfairness in that waiting. Someone who has done nothing except arrive is left with the work of putting others at ease.

OHCHR reports that a UN expert has called for global action on colour-based discrimination against people with albinism. The reported call deserves attention in its own right. It also asks something uncomfortable of ordinary life: how much freedom do we allow another person to have from our assumptions about them?

Curiosity can seem an innocent answer. Surely people should be able to ask about a difference they do not understand. Sometimes a genuine question opens a useful conversation. Yet curiosity does not automatically entitle us to someone else’s time, medical information or patience. There is a difference between a conversation someone chooses and an explanation they are repeatedly expected to provide.

Consider what happens when appearance becomes the permanent subject. A person’s interests, competence, irritability, humour and ordinary preoccupations all have to compete with it. Even sympathetic attention can become confining if it never moves on.

There is a complication here. Saying that everyone should simply be treated the same can provide a comfortable excuse for ignoring discrimination or overlooking an actual need. Fairness requires enough attention to recognise a barrier, without deciding that the barrier tells us everything about the person facing it.

That takes judgement. At work, in a family or among neighbours, it means questioning an assumption before making someone live with its consequences. It means listening when a person describes what would help, rather than supplying an answer on their behalf.

Global action cannot be replaced by pleasant individual encounters. Equally, a public commitment leaves plenty untouched if ordinary encounters remain governed by the same old expectations. Someone should be able to enter a room with a purpose of their own, and get on with it.

Privacy choices